Canadian tyranny & other news
Jul. 23rd, 2010 04:17 pm- Item: Health Canada says no one should take more than 2,000 IU of Vitamin D per day, but one study says the average vitamin D researcher personally takes 5,000 IU. A day of sunbathing is like taking 10,000 IU.
- Item: Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq (under orders from Prime Minister Harper) refuses to sign the Vienna Declaration ("criminalization of drug use is fuelling the HIV/AIDS epidemic") because it clashes with Canada's national drug policy. It isn't news that when facts and policy clash, the Harper govenment doubles down for policy. Is there a policy regarding Vitamin D supplements? Why or why not?
- Item: In a move that shouldn't have been as surprising as it was, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled unanimously that Nuremberg Principle V is still the law of the land in Canada. "I was just following orders" does not excuse a Charter violation by a police officer! The stupid cop chose a high-profile lawyer to pick on and now his department has to pay $5,000 for violating the guy's rights (in addition to a $5,000 payment for false arrest, which was not contested).
- Item: In
TorontoLondon UK, a cop hid his ID, walked up to a newspaper salesman (note: not a high-profile lawyer), and whacked him with a baton for no visible reason as shown by amateur video. After the salesman died, a physician already threatened with losing his licence due to poor autopsy work did the autopsy—and exonerated the police officer. Two other physicians did autopsies on the same corpse and said the death was the cop's fault. Although the officer's homicidal act was caught on video, no charges will be laid against him because "experts disagree". - Item: Joyce Murray, a member of Parliament for Vancouver and a Liberal, exaggerated a little when discussing the mandatory national census (which Harper recently eliminated over the objections of the arm's-length government agency that, you know, is actually supposed to decide such things). She said the independence of such agencies is "what separates a government from a tyranny." Never slow to seize such an opportunity, the Conservative Party struck back, saying they "understand what ‘tyranny’ means”. Yes, I think they do.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-23 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-23 11:41 pm (UTC)