Nov. 2nd, 2023

pyesetz: (Default)

(Subject is the title of a book by Douglas Adams.)

I hereby raise my bet to 150% short.  I hope this turns out to have been a good idea.  Today’s closing price is higher than I would have preferred, but at least we are still within the lime-green channel.  If we hit that ole’ dashed orange line again (or even exceed the lime channel significantly), this trade is toast and I will need to cancel it at a loss.  Right now I’m sitting on an unrealized imaginary gain of +1.6%, hoping for more.

On Aug 29 I wrote: “the red line came very close on Aug 25, … so I think I’ll skip the contrarian trade on the next downswing.”  But then on Sep 07 I wrote, “Meanwhile, the red line has since fallen away…, so why not trade long here?”  This utterance is my chief contender for “stupidest thing said all year” and a solid reason for you to always remember that you are watching 🐔 🪛 ⚾ (The Crank Channel).  A quick scan through recent years (which I could have done at any time) shows that long trades after falling red lines do not do well.  This makes sense: a falling red line means there have been no new highs in a month, so maybe not a good time for a bullish bet?  If I add a new rule “needs to have been a new high within the last 22 days before beginning a long trade” then the entire -14.6% loser trade would have been skipped.  What an expensive lesson!

Lawyers: nothing.

Profile

pyesetz: (Default)
Pyesetz/Песец

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 03:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios